Antos v. Antos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Antos v. Antos

51 A.D.2d 961, 380 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 961 (Antos v. Antos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antos v. Antos, 51 A.D.2d 961, 380 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a judgment of divorce, which judgment ordered him to pay $100 per week as alimony and $40 per week, per child, as child support, defendant appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 4, 1975, as granted the branch of [962]*962plaintiffs cross motion which sought to modify the said judgment with respect to its alimony and child support provisions to the extent of reducing the amounts to be paid thereunder. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, with costs, and the said branch of the cross motion is denied. We hold that plaintiff, a dentist with a yearly income in excess of $75,000, can manage his personal finances and, at the same time, provide adequate financial support to his family. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Christ and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a judgment of divorce, which judgment ordered him to pay $100 per week as alimony and $40 per week, per child, as child support, defendant appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 4, 1975, as granted the branch of [962]*962plaintiffs cross motion which sought to modify the said judgment with respect to its alimony and child support provisions to the extent of reducing the amounts to be paid thereunder. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, with costs, and the said branch of the cross motion is denied. We hold that plaintiff, a dentist with a yearly income in excess of $75,000, can manage his personal finances and, at the same time, provide adequate financial support to his family. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Christ and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 961, 380 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antos-v-antos-nyappdiv-1976.