ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 2022·No. 20-1767·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 5, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-1767

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13200010782FC, CS 2001412179, DOAH 20-004273-CS

Antorius Curtis,

Appellant,

vs.

Department of Revenue, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Department of Revenue.

Antorius Curtis, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

HENDON, J.

Based on the Department of Revenue’s partial confession of error, we reverse that portion of the Final Administrative Paternity and Support Order, Child Support Guidelines Worksheet, and Income Deduction Order, and remand to the trial court for determination of Curtis’s gross monthly income and to make any adjustments in child support if necessary. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s rulings.

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.