ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
This text of ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 5, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1767 Lower Tribunal Nos. 13200010782FC, CS 2001412179, DOAH 20-004273-CS ________________
Antorius Curtis, Appellant,
vs.
Department of Revenue, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the State of Florida Department of Revenue.
Antorius Curtis, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.
Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.
HENDON, J. Based on the Department of Revenue’s partial confession of error,
we reverse that portion of the Final Administrative Paternity and Support
Order, Child Support Guidelines Worksheet, and Income Deduction Order,
and remand to the trial court for determination of Curtis’s gross monthly
income and to make any adjustments in child support if necessary. We
affirm the remainder of the trial court’s rulings.
Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTORIUS CURTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antorius-curtis-v-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2022.