Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 23, 2016
Docket01-16-00202-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments (Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00202-CV ——————————— ANTONY CLARK, Appellant V. SAGO PALMS APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1073737

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Antony Clark, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015);

Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay

the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being

notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antony-clark-v-sago-palms-apartments-texapp-2016.