Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments
This text of Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments (Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 23, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00202-CV ——————————— ANTONY CLARK, Appellant V. SAGO PALMS APARTMENTS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1073737
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Antony Clark, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015);
Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay
the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being
notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Antony Clark v. Sago Palms Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antony-clark-v-sago-palms-apartments-texapp-2016.