Antonoff v. Family Television, Inc.
This text of 105 A.D.2d 823 (Antonoff v. Family Television, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a shareholder’s derivative action, defendant Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Slifkin, J.), dated June 4,1984, which denied its motion for summary judgment and for dismissal of the cross claim of defendant Family Television, Inc.
Order affirmed, with costs.
The presence of triable issues of fact mandates denial of summary judgment (Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 103 AD2d 252). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A.D.2d 823, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonoff-v-family-television-inc-nyappdiv-1984.