Antonoff v. Family Television, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 823, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 1984·Published
Opinion
In a shareholder’s derivative action, defendant Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Slifkin, J.), dated June 4,1984, which denied its motion for summary judgment and for dismissal of the cross claim of defendant Family Television, Inc.
Order affirmed, with costs.
The presence of triable issues of fact mandates denial of summary judgment (Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 103 AD2d 252). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Antonoff v. Family Television, Inc., 105 A.D.2d 823, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
105 A.D.2d 823 (Antonoff v. Family Television, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
103 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)