Antonious v. Muhammad
702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 913, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3059
This text of 702 N.E.2d 837 (Antonious v. Muhammad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Antonious v. Muhammad, 702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 913, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3059 (N.Y. 1998).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendants Ronald Taggart, Mary Murphy, Rockland County, John Grant, Walter J. Green and Kenneth Gribetz, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie (see, CPLR 5602); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Antonious v. Muhammad
95 F. Supp. 2d 156 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 913, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonious-v-muhammad-ny-1998.