Antoniou v. USPS

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 2024
Docket23-2385
StatusUnpublished

This text of Antoniou v. USPS (Antoniou v. USPS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antoniou v. USPS, (Fed. Cir. 2024).

Opinion

Case: 23-2385 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 01/25/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MICHAEL ANTONIOU, Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent ______________________

2023-2385 ______________________

Petition for review of No. 4G19N-4G-D-2333 8774. ______________________

Before LOURIE, PROST, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER In response to this court’s October 25, 2023, order di- recting the parties to show cause regarding our jurisdic- tion, the United States Postal Service urges dismissal. Michael Antoniou has not filed a response. Mr. Antoniou’s union filed a grievance challenging his notice of removal as a letter carrier with the United States Postal Service. On August 4, 2023, a dispute resolution team concluded that Mr. Antoniou’s removal would be sus- tained unless he voluntarily resigned. Mr. Antoniou then Case: 23-2385 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 01/25/2024

filed a petition for review with this court, challenging that August 4, 2023, decision. This court’s jurisdiction is limited. Although the court has jurisdiction over “an appeal from a final order or final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board,” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9), and to “review . . . arbitration awards under a negotiated grievance procedure pursuant to [5 U.S.C. §] 7121(a),” Burke v. USPS, 888 F.2d 833, 834 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (citing § 7121(f)), Mr. Antoniou acknowledges that the “case never went to MSPB or Arbitration,” ECF No. 6 at 3. Rather, this is a direct appeal from a USPS dispute resolution team’s decision. Such appeals are out- side our authority to directly review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This matter is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. (3) All pending motions are denied. FOR THE COURT

January 25, 2024 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Julian W. Burke v. United States Postal Service
888 F.2d 833 (Federal Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Antoniou v. USPS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antoniou-v-usps-cafc-2024.