ANTONIO WILBURN v. RICKY D. DIXON, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

ANTONIO WILBURN v. RICKY D. DIXON, etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 2022

Docket22-1023

StatusPublished

This text of ANTONIO WILBURN v. RICKY D. DIXON, etc. (ANTONIO WILBURN v. RICKY D. DIXON, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ANTONIO WILBURN v. RICKY D. DIXON, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1023 Lower Tribunal No. F94-25367 ________________

Antonio Wilburn, Petitioner,

vs.

Ricky D. Dixon, etc., Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Antonio Wilburn, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for respondent.

Before EMAS, SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI