Antonio Villeda and Antonio Villeda Law Group v. Rene Angel Hernandez
Opinion
NUMBER 13-25-00047-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ANTONIO VILLEDA AND ANTONIO VILLEDA LAW GROUP, Appellants,
v.
RENE ANGEL HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE PROBATE COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court on appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal. This Court severed appellants’ attempted appeal of the “Plea in the Abatement, Motion to Stay Proceedings, and in the Alternative for Continuance” from cause number 13-25-00040- CV into cause number 13-25-00047-CV. On February 4, 2025, the Clerk of the Court
informed appellants that said appeal was not an appealable order and that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the defect was not cured within ten days. Appellants did not cure the defect, and there is no final appealable order currently before the Court.
Appellants then filed this motion to dismiss. Appellee did not file a response. We hereby grant appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal, and we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Costs will be taxed against appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed. 1 See id. 42.3. Having dismissed the appeal pursuant to appeallants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
JAIME TIJERINA
Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 6th day of March, 2025.
1 We deny appellants’ pending emergency motion to stay the trial court proceedings as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Antonio Villeda and Antonio Villeda Law Group v. Rene Angel Hernandez (Antonio Villeda and Antonio Villeda Law Group v. Rene Angel Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.