Antonio v. Arlington County's Commonwealth Attorney

Fourth Circuit

Antonio v. Arlington County's Commonwealth Attorney

193 F. App'x 224

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. 06-6189·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gabriel A. Antonio appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his petition for writ of injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Antonio v. Arlington County’s Commonwealth Attorney, No. 1:05— cv-00510-JCC (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before' the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gabriel A. Antonio appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his petition for writ of injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Antonio v. Arlington County’s Commonwealth Attorney, No. 1:05— cv-00510-JCC (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before' the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Antonio v. Arlington County's Commonwealth Attorney, 193 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

193 F. App'x 224 (Antonio v. Arlington County's Commonwealth Attorney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.