Antonio Robinson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 2016
DocketA16A1092
StatusPublished

This text of Antonio Robinson v. State (Antonio Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antonio Robinson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 10, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1092. ANTONIO ROBINSON v. THE STATE.

In March 1996, Antonio Robinson pled guilty to three counts of armed robbery and was sentenced to concurrent life sentences. In July 2015, Robinson filed a “Motion for a Demand for Speedy Trial” pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-170, which the trial court denied. Robinson filed this direct appeal.1 A defendant who files a statutory speedy trial demand may be entitled to discharge and acquittal if he is not tried within two terms of court after the filing of the demand. See OCGA § 17-7-170; Walker v. State, 290 Ga. 696, 697 (1) (723 SE2d 894) (2012). Given that Robinson has already pled guilty, he has no basis for invoking OCGA § 17-7-170 to seek a speedy trial. An appeal of an issue that has become moot is subject to dismissal. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3). A moot issue is one where a ruling is sought on a matter that has no practical effect on the alleged controversy or where the issues have ceased to exist. See Carlock v. Kmart Corp., 227 Ga. App. 356, 361 (3) (a) (489 SE2d 99) (1997). Here, Robinson has already pled guilty and is thus not subject to being tried. Accordingly, any ruling on his demand for speedy trial would have no practical effect. For this reason, this appeal is moot and is therefore DISMISSED. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).

1 Robinson file the appeal in the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter to this Court. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/10/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlock v. Kmart Corp.
489 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Walker v. State
723 S.E.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Antonio Robinson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-robinson-v-state-gactapp-2016.