Antonio Richardson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Antonio Richardson v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 2017

Docket17-0199

StatusPublished

This text of Antonio Richardson v. State of Florida (Antonio Richardson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonio Richardson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ANTONIO RICHARDSON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-0199

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed February 1, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Antonio Richardson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI