Antonio R Richardson v. State of Florida

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-1743

_____________________________

ANTONIO R. RICHARDSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stephen S. Everett, Judge.

November 6, 2024

ON MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal, merits briefing was completed in 2023, and supplemental briefing that we ordered was completed September 13, 2024. On October 18, 2024, Appellant’s counsel moved to relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) to address the potential impact of the United States Supreme Court’s June 21, 2024 decision in Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), which had not been raised earlier.

We deny the motion as improperly filed and served after Appellant’s initial brief was filed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) (“The motion may be filed by appellate counsel and must be served

2

before the party’s first brief is served.”). We express no opinion on whether Erlinger affects Florida law.

DENIED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Lynne Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.