Antonio R Herrera v. Richard Seiler Dpm
This text of Antonio R Herrera v. Richard Seiler Dpm (Antonio R Herrera v. Richard Seiler Dpm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 21, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160887 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra MARIA LOPEZ, Personal Representative of Richard H. Bernstein the ESTATE OF ANTONIO R. HERRERA, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 160887 COA: 347902 Ottawa CC: 17-005172-NH RICHARD SEILER, DPM, and HOLLAND FOOT AND ANKLE CENTER, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 21, 2020 a1014 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Antonio R Herrera v. Richard Seiler Dpm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-r-herrera-v-richard-seiler-dpm-mich-2020.