Antonio Murillo-Cadena v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Eighth Circuit

Antonio Murillo-Cadena v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

560 F. App'x 640

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 2014

Docket13-3604

StatusUnpublished

This text of 560 F. App'x 640 (Antonio Murillo-Cadena v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonio Murillo-Cadena v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 560 F. App'x 640 (8th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Antonio Murillo-Cadena petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, denying his request to reopen his removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that no abuse of discretion occurred. See Chen v. Holder, No. 13-1103, 751 F.3d 876, 878-79, 2014 WL 1887364, at *2 (8th Cir. May, 13, 2014) (abuse-of-discretion standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Antonio Murillo-Cadena petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, denying his request to reopen his removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that no abuse of discretion occurred. See Chen v. Holder, No. 13-1103, 751 F.3d 876, 878-79, 2014 WL 1887364, at *2 (8th Cir. May, 13, 2014) (abuse-of-discretion standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 F. App'x 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-murillo-cadena-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack