Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence
This text of Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence (Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 2, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151755 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, ANTONIO HILL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 151755 COA: 320884 Oakland CC: 2013-132180-CZ ESSENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE LLC and YOLANDA WALKER, Defendants-Appellees.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 2, 2016 a0418 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-hill-v-essential-support-services-independent-existence-mich-2016.