Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 2016·No. 151755·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

151755 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

ANTONIO HILL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 151755 COA: 320884 Oakland CC: 2013-132180-CZ ESSENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE LLC and YOLANDA WALKER, Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2016

a0418

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence, (Mich. 2016).

Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence (Antonio Hill v. Essential Support Services Independent Existence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.