Antonio Giles v. State of Florida

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-0434

LT Case Nos. 2018-CF-025150-A 2018-CF-023480-A 2018-CF-023196-A

_____________________________

ANTONIO GILES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Tesha Scolaro Ballou, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders * appeal, upon independent review of the record, we affirm. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987).

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order reflecting its oral revocation of probation and the conditions of probation that the trial court found Appellant to have violated. See Mitchell v. State, 238 So. 3d 386, 386–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Barta v. State, 678 So. 2d 923, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

SOUD, MACIVER, and PRATT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________