Antonio Garrett v. State of Florida

192 So. 3d 470, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 273, 2016 WL 3194208, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1196
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 9, 2016·No. SC14-2110·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted discretionary review of the decision in Garrett v. State, 148 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Upon further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding,

It is so ordered.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by'the Court. See Fla, R.App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which QUINCE, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antonio Garrett v. State of Florida, 192 So. 3d 470, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 273, 2016 WL 3194208, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1196 (Fla. 2016).

192 So. 3d 470 (Antonio Garrett v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andujar-Ruiz v. State
205 So. 3d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Dooley v. State
206 So. 3d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)