Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company

New York Court of Appeals

Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company

DecidedDecember 14, 2017

Docket148 SSM 37

StatusPublished

This text of Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company (Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company, (N.Y. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 148 SSM 37 Antonio Garcia, Appellant, v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent.

Submitted by Jonathan A. Dachs, for appellant. Submitted by Richard A. Fogel, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. There is no ambiguity in the policy as to coverage or divisibility. The parties contracted for $2 million of coverage. Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks merit. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided December 14, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 148 SSM 37 Antonio Garcia, Appellant, v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent.

Submitted by Jonathan A. Dachs, for appellant. Submitted by Richard A. Fogel, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. There is no ambiguity in the policy as to coverage or divisibility. The parties contracted for $2 million of coverage. Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks merit. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided December 14, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Antonio Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-garcia-v-government-employees-insurance-company-ny-2017.