Antonio Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director

713 F. App'x 370
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2018
Docket17-11036
StatusUnpublished

This text of 713 F. App'x 370 (Antonio Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antonio Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director, 713 F. App'x 370 (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Antonio Freeman, Texas prisoner #1512080, moves to dismiss without prejudice his interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the district court in connection with his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceedings. Freeman’s payment of the $5.00 filing fee rendered moot the issue of his IFP status in the district court, as his case was not dismissed and is proceeding to resolution there.

The IFP order in the instant case “is not appealable as a final judgment because it did not end the litigation on the merits.” Thompson v. Drewry, 138 F.3d 984, 986 (5th Cir. 1998).

The motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED without prejudice.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Drewry
138 F.3d 984 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 F. App'x 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-freeman-v-lorie-davis-director-ca5-2018.