Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

Ninth Circuit

Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

62 F.4th 1232

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 2023

Docket20-71923

StatusPublished

This text of 62 F.4th 1232 (Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland, 62 F.4th 1232 (9th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO DE LA ROSA-RODRIGUEZ, No. 20-71923 AKA Antonio Delarosa Rodriguez, Agency No. A208-084-297 Petitioner,

v. ORDER

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion published at 49 F.4th 1282

(9th Cir. 2022) is vacated.

Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI