Antonio Cruz Vazquez v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and United States of America, Real Party in Interest
This text of 572 F.2d 697 (Antonio Cruz Vazquez v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and United States of America, Real Party in Interest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Before BROWNING, WALLACE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.
The petitioner, resisting removal in.a proceeding under Rule 40, F.R.Crim.P., seeks a writ of mandamus directing the removal court to: order the United States Government to provide petitioner with copies of court wiretap orders, and accompanying applications, and the contents of intercepted wire communications and evidence derived therefrom; and to allow petitioner to raise the issue of the legality of the wire interceptions by way of a motion to suppress, as envisioned under 18 U.S.C. § 2518(10)(a).
Upon due consideration, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See In Re Ellsberg, 446 F.2d 954 (1st Cir. 1971).
The petitioner’s motion to stay removal pending our decision on the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 F.2d 697, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-cruz-vazquez-v-united-states-district-court-for-the-district-of-ca9-1978.