Antonio Ben Espinoza v. Department of the Navy
This text of 57 F.3d 1083 (Antonio Ben Espinoza v. Department of the Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1083
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Antonio Ben ESPINOZA, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.
No. 95-3449.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 25, 1995.
67 M.S.P.R. 208.
DISMISSED.
ORDER
Upon further consideration, it is
ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED; and the petition for review is hereby, DISMISSED, under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1083, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25742, 1995 WL 334359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-ben-espinoza-v-department-of-the-navy-cafc-1995.