Antonellis v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Antonellis v. City of New York

18 A.D.2d 686, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6346

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 686 (Antonellis v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonellis v. City of New York, 18 A.D.2d 686, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained by the infant plaintiff in a fall from a defective swing in defendant’s playground, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 23, 1962, as, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision and order, dated April 13, 1961, which denied plaintiff’s application for a preference in trial pursuant to rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules. Order dated March 23, 1962, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained by the infant plaintiff in a fall from a defective swing in defendant’s playground, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 23, 1962, as, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision and order, dated April 13, 1961, which denied plaintiff’s application for a preference in trial pursuant to rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules. Order dated March 23, 1962, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 686, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonellis-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1962.