Antonelli v. Majestic Theater

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Antonelli v. Majestic Theater

49 A.D.2d 898, 373 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 898 (Antonelli v. Majestic Theater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonelli v. Majestic Theater, 49 A.D.2d 898, 373 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 26,1973, in favor of defendant, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case at a jury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The fact that the assailant was in the same place a half hour after defendant’s employee was advised of the first encounter is not proof, by itself, that the latter had failed to act properly after being so advised. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 26,1973, in favor of defendant, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case at a jury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The fact that the assailant was in the same place a half hour after defendant’s employee was advised of the first encounter is not proof, by itself, that the latter had failed to act properly after being so advised. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 898, 373 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonelli-v-majestic-theater-nyappdiv-1975.