Antonaccio v. State
This text of 415 P.3d 1005 (Antonaccio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These are pro se appeals from purported district court decisions dismissing postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.
This court's review of these appeals reveals jurisdictional defects. The documents filed in this court do not indicate that postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus have been filed in district court case numbers C204825 and C199740, the case numbers designated in the notices of appeal. To the extent that appellant appeals from the findings of fact, conclusions of law and order entered on January 5, 2017, the notices of appeal were untimely filed. "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State,
ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 P.3d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonaccio-v-state-nev-2018.