Antonacci v. Antonacci

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Antonacci v. Antonacci

146 So. 3d 514, 2014 WL 3805746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11898

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2014

DocketNo. 1D11-3669

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 3d 514 (Antonacci v. Antonacci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonacci v. Antonacci, 146 So. 3d 514, 2014 WL 3805746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in failing to conform the written order on rehearing to its oral pronouncement at the hearing on the issue of the parties’ respective pensions. See Maggard v. Maggard, 844 So.2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Leonard v. Leonard, 613 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gallardo v. Gallardo, 593 So.2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We therefore reverse those portions of the order on rehearing that address the parties’ pensions and we remand with directions to conform the written judgment to the court’s oral pronouncement that each party would be entitled to one half of the marital portion of the other party’s pension value at the time of retirement. Having found no merit to the appellant’s remaining arguments, we affirm the order in all other respects.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in failing to conform the written order on rehearing to its oral pronouncement at the hearing on the issue of the parties’ respective pensions. See Maggard v. Maggard, 844 So.2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Leonard v. Leonard, 613 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gallardo v. Gallardo, 593 So.2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We therefore reverse those portions of the order on rehearing that address the parties’ pensions and we remand with directions to conform the written judgment to the court’s oral pronouncement that each party would be entitled to one half of the marital portion of the other party’s pension value at the time of retirement. Having found no merit to the appellant’s remaining arguments, we affirm the order in all other respects.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 3d 514, 2014 WL 3805746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonacci-v-antonacci-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack