Anton v. Town Board of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anton v. Town Board of Huntington

81 A.D.2d 902, 441 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11618

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 902 (Anton v. Town Board of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anton v. Town Board of Huntington, 81 A.D.2d 902, 441 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to issue to petitioners a permit, without restrictions, allowing them to repair their dock, the petitioners appeal from a judgment [903]*903of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 5, 1980, which dismissed their petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The only question raised on appeal, whether petitioners’ dock was within the Town of Huntington or the Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay, was not presented to Special Term, and accordingly may not properly be considered on appeal (see Matter of Reiss v Abramowitz, 39 AD2d 916; Matter of Pangburn v Plummer, 36 AD2d 883). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to issue to petitioners a permit, without restrictions, allowing them to repair their dock, the petitioners appeal from a judgment [903]*903of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 5, 1980, which dismissed their petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The only question raised on appeal, whether petitioners’ dock was within the Town of Huntington or the Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay, was not presented to Special Term, and accordingly may not properly be considered on appeal (see Matter of Reiss v Abramowitz, 39 AD2d 916; Matter of Pangburn v Plummer, 36 AD2d 883). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 902, 441 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anton-v-town-board-of-huntington-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack