Antolish v. Paul

283 F. 957, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided May 18, 1922·No. No. 3045·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the opinion of Judge Geiger in this case, which was filed on August 16, 1921, and the opinion of the Circuit Court of [960] Appeals for the First Circuit, rendered on January 11, 1922, and reported in Skeffington v. Katzeff et al., 277 Fed. 129, dealing with the same issues of law and fact, the decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antolish v. Paul, 283 F. 957, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309 (7th Cir. 1922).

283 F. 957 (Antolish v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.
343 P.2d 36 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. Nowak
133 F. Supp. 191 (E.D. Michigan, 1955)
Milasinovich v. Serbian Progressive Club, Inc.
84 A.2d 571 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Barsky v. United States
167 F.2d 241 (D.C. Circuit, 1948)
Communist Party of United States of America v. Peek
127 P.2d 889 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Pawell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
22 A.2d 43 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Huff v. Reeves
106 P.2d 729 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
Strecker v. Kessler
95 F.2d 976 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
Kjar v. Doak
61 F.2d 566 (Seventh Circuit, 1932)
Murdoch v. Clark
53 F.2d 155 (First Circuit, 1931)
Fierstein v. Conaty
41 F.2d 53 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)
Pestereff v. Reed
7 Alaska 644 (D. Alaska, 1927)
Ex Parte Jurgans
17 F.2d 507 (D. Minnesota, 1927)
Jew Bok v. Nagle
7 F.2d 372 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Ungar v. Seaman
4 F.2d 80 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
United States Ex Rel. Lisafeld v. Smith
2 F.2d 90 (W.D. New York, 1924)