Antolish v. Paul
283 F. 957, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1922
DocketNo. 3045
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases
This text of 283 F. 957 (Antolish v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Antolish v. Paul, 283 F. 957, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309 (7th Cir. 1922).
Opinion
On the opinion of Judge Geiger in this case, which was filed on August 16, 1921, and the opinion of the Circuit Court of [960]*960Appeals for the First Circuit, rendered on January 11, 1922, and reported in Skeffington v. Katzeff et al., 277 Fed. 129, dealing with the same issues of law and fact, the decision is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.
343 P.2d 36 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. Nowak
133 F. Supp. 191 (E.D. Michigan, 1955)
Milasinovich v. Serbian Progressive Club, Inc.
84 A.2d 571 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Barsky v. United States
167 F.2d 241 (D.C. Circuit, 1948)
Communist Party of United States of America v. Peek
127 P.2d 889 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Pawell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
22 A.2d 43 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Huff v. Reeves
106 P.2d 729 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
Strecker v. Kessler
95 F.2d 976 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
United States Ex Rel. Fortmueller v. Commissioner of Immigration
14 F. Supp. 484 (S.D. New York, 1936)
Kjar v. Doak
61 F.2d 566 (Seventh Circuit, 1932)
Murdoch v. Clark
53 F.2d 155 (First Circuit, 1931)
Fierstein v. Conaty
41 F.2d 53 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)
Pestereff v. Reed
7 Alaska 644 (D. Alaska, 1927)
Ex Parte Jurgans
17 F.2d 507 (D. Minnesota, 1927)
Jew Bok v. Nagle
7 F.2d 372 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Ungar v. Seaman
4 F.2d 80 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
United States Ex Rel. Lisafeld v. Smith
2 F.2d 90 (W.D. New York, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
283 F. 957, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antolish-v-paul-ca7-1922.