Antoine v. Vives

59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-2947
StatusPublished

This text of 59 So. 3d 293 (Antoine v. Vives) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antoine v. Vives, 59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 45.0315, Fla. , Stat. (2010) (providing statutory right of redemption provides holder of any subordinate interest with right to cure the mortgagor’s indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale at any time before the later of the filing of a certificate of sale, or time specified in the judgment of foreclosure); See also Saidi v. Wasko, 687 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that the right of redemption is an estate in land and a protected equitable right of the mortgagor; it allows the mortgagor to reclaim her estate in foreclosed property after it has been forfeited by paying the amount of the debt, interest and costs. A mortgagor need not obtain permission of the trial court before exercising the right of redemption).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saidi v. Wasko
687 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antoine-v-vives-fladistctapp-2011.