Antoine v. Vives

59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2011·No. No. 3D10-2947·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 45.0315, Fla. , Stat. (2010) (providing statutory right of redemption provides holder of any subordinate interest with right to cure the mortgagor’s indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale at any time before the later of the filing of a certificate of sale, or time specified in the judgment of foreclosure); See also Saidi v. Wasko, 687 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that the right of redemption is an estate in land and a protected equitable right of the mortgagor; it allows the mortgagor to reclaim her estate in foreclosed property after it has been forfeited by paying the amount of the debt, interest and costs. A mortgagor need not obtain permission of the trial court before exercising the right of redemption).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antoine v. Vives, 59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

59 So. 3d 293 (Antoine v. Vives) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saidi v. Wasko
687 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)