Antoine v. Vives
This text of 59 So. 3d 293 (Antoine v. Vives) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 45.0315, Fla. , Stat. (2010) (providing statutory right of redemption provides holder of any subordinate interest with right to cure the mortgagor’s indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale at any time before the later of the filing of a certificate of sale, or time specified in the judgment of foreclosure); See also Saidi v. Wasko, 687 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that the right of redemption is an estate in land and a protected equitable right of the mortgagor; it allows the mortgagor to reclaim her estate in foreclosed property after it has been forfeited by paying the amount of the debt, interest and costs. A mortgagor need not obtain permission of the trial court before exercising the right of redemption).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 So. 3d 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 2011 WL 1443656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antoine-v-vives-fladistctapp-2011.