Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Co.

140 So. 158, 19 La. App. 216, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 298

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 16, 1932

DocketNo. 4125

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 158 (Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Co., 140 So. 158, 19 La. App. 216, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 298 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

McGregor, j.

The facts of this case are the same as those in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated (La. App.) 140 So. 151, this day decided. The plaintiff, Adeline Antoine, is the widow of Milton Antoine, who lost his life in the collision, and she has brought suit for $15,000 damages for his death. This case was tried and submitted on the same evidence as was the case of Peter Antoine, and the same judgment was rendered by the lower court, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs of both courts to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGregor, j.

The facts of this case are the same as those in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated (La. App.) 140 So. 151, this day decided. The plaintiff, Adeline Antoine, is the widow of Milton Antoine, who lost his life in the collision, and she has brought suit for $15,000 damages for his death. This case was tried and submitted on the same evidence as was the case of Peter Antoine, and the same judgment was rendered by the lower court, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs of both courts to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 158, 19 La. App. 216, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antoine-v-interurban-transportation-co-lactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack