Antoine Benson v. State
This text of Antoine Benson v. State (Antoine Benson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00519-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ANTOINE BENSON, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 274th District Court of Hays County, Texas.
ORDER FOR PRO SE ACCESS TO RECORD Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is a letter regarding appellant's inability to access the appellate
record. Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief herein. Furthermore, appellant has been
unable to examine the record in order to prepare a pro se brief, if he so chooses. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure appellant’s
opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before the expiration of fourteen
(14) days from the date of this Order, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court
notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to
appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). It is FURTHER
ORDERED appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was
first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have
twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 14th day of August, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Antoine Benson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antoine-benson-v-state-texapp-2020.