Antle v. Johanns

Fourth Circuit

Antle v. Johanns

264 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2008·No. Nos. 07-1396, 07-1557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bhagavan Antle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for preliminary injunction and summary judgment and granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Antle v. Johanns, No. 4:06-cv-01008-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 1 & June 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bhagavan Antle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for preliminary injunction and summary judgment and granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Antle v. Johanns, No. 4:06-cv-01008-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 1 & June 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Antle v. Johanns, 264 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

264 F. App'x 271 (Antle v. Johanns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.