Antisdel v. Chicago Hotel Cabinet Co.
90 F. 828, 32 C.C.A. 602, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1742
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Antisdel v. Chicago Hotel Cabinet Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 F. 308 →
Opinion
It is now here ordered that, in lieu of the words “dismiss the bill,” there be inserted in the opinion the words “proceed in accordance with this opinion”; and in the decree of this court there be inserted, in lieu of the words “dismiss the bill,” the words “proceed in accordance with the opinion of this court”; and it is further ordered that the petition for rehearing in this cause be, and the same is hereby, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Antisdel v. Chicago Hotel Cabinet Co., 90 F. 828, 32 C.C.A. 602, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1742 (7th Cir. 1898).
90 F. 828 (Antisdel v. Chicago Hotel Cabinet Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.