Antinoro v. Tops Markets, Inc.
This text of 195 A.D.2d 972 (Antinoro v. Tops Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. There are triable issues of fact whether defendant breached its duty to keep its premises "in a reasonably safe condition, considering all of the circumstances including the purpose of the person’s presence and the likelihood of injury” (Macey v Truman, 70 NY2d 918, 919; see also, Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233, 240-241; Baker v Sportservice Corp., 142 AD2d 991, 992). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, and Fallon, Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.D.2d 972, 602 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antinoro-v-tops-markets-inc-nyappdiv-1993.