Antifun Limited T/A Premium Vape v. Wayne Industries LLC

S.D. New York

Antifun Limited T/A Premium Vape v. Wayne Industries LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 9, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-00057·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANTIFUN LIMITED T/A PREMIUM VAPE, Plaintiff, 22 Civ. 57 (PAE) ~ ORDER WAYNE INDUSTRIES LLC, DOUGLAS RUTH, Defendants,

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On March 30, 2022, plaintiff filed the operative complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. Dkt. 15 (“AC”). On review, it appears to the Court that feendent Wayne Indusiries LLC is a limited liability company (“LLC”). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. While the AC alleges that Wayne is registered in Wyoming and does business in New York, the AC does not also allege the citizenship of the LLC’s members. To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, the Court orders plaintiff, by June 14, 2022, to file a letter, which must clarify the AC’s allegations as follows: allege (1) the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the LLC and (2) the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the LLC. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). If plaintiff is unable to clarify the allegations in the AC so as to truthfully allege complete diversity based upon the citizenship of

each constituent person or entity of the LLC, then the AC will be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction. See Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) (“{Sjubject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine gua non for the exercise of federal judicial power.”). SO ORDERED. Fam A Cryelrg Paul A. Engelmayet United States District Judge

Dated: June 9, 2022 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANTIFUN LIMITED T/A PREMIUM VAPE, Plaintiff, 22 Civ. 57 (PAE) ~ ORDER WAYNE INDUSTRIES LLC, DOUGLAS RUTH, Defendants,

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On March 30, 2022, plaintiff filed the operative complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. Dkt. 15 (“AC”). On review, it appears to the Court that feendent Wayne Indusiries LLC is a limited liability company (“LLC”). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. While the AC alleges that Wayne is registered in Wyoming and does business in New York, the AC does not also allege the citizenship of the LLC’s members. To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, the Court orders plaintiff, by June 14, 2022, to file a letter, which must clarify the AC’s allegations as follows: allege (1) the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the LLC and (2) the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the LLC. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). If plaintiff is unable to clarify the allegations in the AC so as to truthfully allege complete diversity based upon the citizenship of

each constituent person or entity of the LLC, then the AC will be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction. See Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) (“{Sjubject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine gua non for the exercise of federal judicial power.”). SO ORDERED. Fam A Cryelrg Paul A. Engelmayet United States District Judge

Dated: June 9, 2022 New York, New York

Antifun Limited T/A Premium Vape v. Wayne Industries LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Antifun Limited T/A Premium Vape v. Wayne Industries LLC (Antifun Limited T/A Premium Vape v. Wayne Industries LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related