Anticich v. Mihaljevich
This text of 14 Teiss. 275 (Anticich v. Mihaljevich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
His Honor,
rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as, follows:
This is an appeal from a judgment appointing a Receiver or Liquidator, to collect the assets of a dissolved partnership and distribute the proceeds among the former partners.
The petition (duly sworn to) alleges that those assets amount to $8745.97, and there is in the record a document signed by both plaintiff and defendant in the Slavonian tongue (a translation whereof is annexed to the petition) showing that said sum correctly represents the assets of the defunct partnership yet to be accounted for.
This Court is therefore clearly without jurisdiction of this appeal, which should be taken to the Supreme Court. Jaco v. Jaco, 8th Court of Appeal, 97; Perkins v. Crystal Ice Co., 119 La., 519.
It is therefore ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana upon appellant or his attorney of record making out and filing his affidavit that the appeal 'was not taken for delay and lodging a transcript of appeal in the Supreme Court within thirty days after this judgment becomes final.
Appeal transferred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Teiss. 275, 1917 La. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anticich-v-mihaljevich-lactapp-1917.