Anthony's Inc. v. Tennenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anthony's Inc. v. Tennenbaum

54 A.D.2d 590, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 2, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 590 (Anthony's Inc. v. Tennenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony's Inc. v. Tennenbaum, 54 A.D.2d 590, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by plaintiff-respondent to dismiss appeals taken by defendant-appellant by notices of appeal dated June 24, 1976 and July 6, 1976. Motion granted, without costs, only with respect to the appeal taken on June 24, 1976. The papers indicate that final judgment in this matter was entered on June 23, 1976. On June 24, 1976 defendant filed a notice of appeal from an earlier order of the County Court, dated January 19, 1976, which struck his answer. Subsequently, on July 6, 1976, defendant filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment. The first notice of appeal was clearly untimely (CPLR 5513) and is also subject to dismissal on the ground that the right to appeal from an intermediate order does not survive the entry of final judgment (10 Carmody-Wait, 2d, NY Prac, § 70:324, p 590; cf. Matter of New York Life Ins. Co. v Galvin, 41 AD2d 83, 86, mod on other grounds 35 NY2d 52). However, since the order striking the answer affects the final judgment, it is subject to review on the timely appeal taken from the final judgment (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1). Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by plaintiff-respondent to dismiss appeals taken by defendant-appellant by notices of appeal dated June 24, 1976 and July 6, 1976. Motion granted, without costs, only with respect to the appeal taken on June 24, 1976. The papers indicate that final judgment in this matter was entered on June 23, 1976. On June 24, 1976 defendant filed a notice of appeal from an earlier order of the County Court, dated January 19, 1976, which struck his answer. Subsequently, on July 6, 1976, defendant filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment. The first notice of appeal was clearly untimely (CPLR 5513) and is also subject to dismissal on the ground that the right to appeal from an intermediate order does not survive the entry of final judgment (10 Carmody-Wait, 2d, NY Prac, § 70:324, p 590; cf. Matter of New York Life Ins. Co. v Galvin, 41 AD2d 83, 86, mod on other grounds 35 NY2d 52). However, since the order striking the answer affects the final judgment, it is subject to review on the timely appeal taken from the final judgment (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1). Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 590, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthonys-inc-v-tennenbaum-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack