Anthony Whitney Norman v. Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in Her Individual Capacity And Chief Justice Sharon Keller of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2021
Docket03-19-00297-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Anthony Whitney Norman v. Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in Her Individual Capacity And Chief Justice Sharon Keller of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Anthony Whitney Norman v. Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in Her Individual Capacity And Chief Justice Sharon Keller of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Whitney Norman v. Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in Her Individual Capacity And Chief Justice Sharon Keller of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 11, 2021

NO. 03-19-00297-CV

Anthony Whitney Norman, Appellant

v.

Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in her Official Capacity as Clerk of The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in her Individual Capacity; and Chief Justice Sharon Keller of The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court on March 25, 2019. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony Whitney Norman v. Deanna Williamson, Clerk of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in Her Individual Capacity And Chief Justice Sharon Keller of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-whitney-norman-v-deanna-williamson-clerk-of-texas-court-of-texapp-2021.