Anthony Whitney Norman v. A. Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky N. Moore and Tammy Shelby
This text of Anthony Whitney Norman v. A. Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky N. Moore and Tammy Shelby (Anthony Whitney Norman v. A. Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky N. Moore and Tammy Shelby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-23-00128-CV
ANTHONY WHITNEY NORMAN, Appellant v.
A. JANAK, BOBBY LUMPKIN, BRYAN COLLIER, SHOVANDA D. MATHIS, MARGARITA THOMAS, ROCKY N. MOORE AND TAMMY SHELBY, Appellees
From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 2230570
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this proceeding brought under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and
Remedies Code, inmate Anthony Whitney Norman appeals from the trial court’s order
signed on April 5, 2023, which dismissed Norman’s claims against a number of parties.
By letter dated October 31, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Norman that this appeal
is subject to dismissal because the trial court’s April 5, 2023 dismissal order did not appear to be final because it did not dispose of Norman’s claims against Shovanda D.
Mathis. Accordingly, the October 31, 2023 letter warned Norman that the Court would
dismiss the appeal unless, within twenty-one days from the date of the letter, Norman
filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We further warned Norman
that the failure to respond to the October 31, 2023 letter is an independent basis upon
which the appeal can be dismissed.
On November 13, 2023, Norman filed a response acknowledging receipt of the
October 31, 2023 letter from this Court. However, rather than show grounds for
continuing the appeal, Norman requested additional documents and made several
threats. Because Norman has not filed a response showing grounds for continuing this
appeal within twenty-one days of October 31, 2023, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(c).
STEVE SMITH Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith (Chief Justice Gray concurs.) Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 28, 2023 [CV06]
Norman v. Janak, et al. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Whitney Norman v. A. Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky N. Moore and Tammy Shelby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-whitney-norman-v-a-janak-bobby-lumpkin-bryan-collier-shovanda-texapp-2023.