Anthony White v. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc.
This text of 612 F. App'x 192 (Anthony White v. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony E. White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his racial discrimination and retaliation claims filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Caterpillar Logis *193 tics, Inc., 67 F.Supp.3d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
On appeal, White does not contest the district court's disposition of his racial harassment and failure to hire or promote claims. He has therefore forfeited appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.2009) (limiting appellate review to arguments raised in the brief).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-white-v-caterpillar-logistics-inc-ca4-2015.