Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk
Opinion
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN SECTI ON FILED June 6, 1997
Cecil Crowson, Jr.
Appellate C ourt Clerk
ANTHONY W NANCE, . ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9701- CV- 00037 a n d BRANDON NANCE, )
) CAMPBELL CI RCUI T
Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s , )
) HON. CONRAD E. TROUTMAN, J R. , v. ) J UDGE )
CHRI STOPHER H. STRUNK, ) AFFI RMED I N PART, ) REVERSED I N PART,
De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e . ) AND REM ANDED
VI C PRYOR, BASI STA, PRYOR & BALLOFF, J a c ks bor o, f or Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s .
DANI EL M GASS, O’ NEI L, PARKER & W LLI AM . I SON, Knoxvi l l e , f or De f e nd a nt - Appe l l e e .
DENNI S L. BABB a nd VONDA M LAUGHLI N, BUTLER, VI NES & BABB, .
Kn o x v i l l e , f or De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e , Gua r a nt y Na t i ona l I ns ur a n c e Co mp a n y.
O P I N I O N
Fr a nks . J .
I n t hi s a c t i on a r i s i ng f r om a mot or ve hi c l e a c c i d e nt , t he de f e nda nt s we r e gr a nt e d s umma r y j udgme nt a nd p l a i n t i f f s h a ve a ppe a l e d.
An a c c i de nt o c c ur r e d be t we e n a mot or ve hi c l e dr i ve n b y p l a i nt i f f Na nc e a nd a t r uc k dr i ve n by de f e nda nt St r unk. Ta k i n g t he e vi de nc e mos t f a vor a bl e t o pl a i nt i f f s , bot h
v e h i c l e s we r e t r a ve l i ng nor t h on I nt e r s t a t e 75, t hr ough t he J el l i co Mount a i ns . Pl a i nt i f f wa s dr i vi ng hi s e mpt y f l a t be d t r a c t or t r a i l e r i n t he l e f t l a ne a t a r a t e of a ppr oxi ma t e l y 60 mp h , whe n a gr e y s t a t i on wa gon s udde nl y s we r ve d i n f r ont of h i m, c a us i ng hi m t o move i nt o t he r i ght l a ne t o a voi d t ha t ve hi c l e . De f e nda nt St r unk’ s t r uc k wa s t r a ve l i ng i n t he r i g h t l a n e a t a ppr oxi ma t e l y 10 t o 15 mi l e s pe r hour , a nd pl a i nt i f f ’ s v e h i c l e c ol l i de d wi t h t he r e a r of St r unk’ s t r uc k.
St r unk s t a t e s t ha t he wa s t r a ve l i ng 40 t o 45 mi l e s p e r h o ur a nd ne ve r s a w t he gr e y s t a t i on wa gon i n t he vi c i ni t y , a n d t ha t pl a i nt i f f ’ s ve hi c l e s i mpl y c a me ba r r e l i ng up t he r i g h t l a ne a nd r e a r - e nde d hi m. The dr i ve r of t he gr e y ve hi c l e h a s n e ve r be e n i de nt i f i e d or f ound.
I n p l a i nt i f f ’ s s ui t a ga i ns t De f e nda nt , p l a i nt i f f a l l e g e d t ha t de f e nda nt wa s t r a ve l i ng a t s uc h a n unr e a s ona bl y l o w r a t e of s pe e d s o a s t o i mpe de t r a f f i c on t he hi ghwa y i n v i o l a t i on of T. C. A. §55- 8- 154 a nd hi s ne gl i ge nc e wa s a p r o x i ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i de nt . Re s pondi ng t o de f e nda nt ’ s mo t i o n f or s umma r y j udgme nt , t he Tr i a l Cour t gr a nt e d s umma r y j u d g me nt on t he ba s i s t ha t t he pr oxi ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i d e n t wa s t h e ne gl i ge nt ope r a t i on of t he gr e y mot or ve hi c l e .
Summa r y j udgme nt i s r e vi e we d wi t hout a t t a c hi ng a ny
p r e s u mpt i on of c or r e c t ne s s t o t he j udgme nt . M Cal l v . W l de r , c i
9 1 3 S. W 2d 150, 153 ( Te nn. 1995) .
. Summa r y j udgme nt i s
a p p r o p r i a t e whe n, vi e wi ng a l l e vi de nc e a nd i nf e r e nc e s i n t h e l i g h t mos t f a vor a bl e t o t he non- movi ng pa r t y, t he r e a r e no d i s p u t e d i s s ue s of ma t e r i a l f a c t a nd t he movi ng pa r t y i s e n t i t l e d t o j udgme nt a s a ma t t e r of l a w. By r d v . Hal l , 847
S. W 2 d 208 ( Te nn. 1993) .
.
The s t a t ut e pl e d i n t hi s c a s e r e a ds i n pe r t i ne nt pa r t :
M ni m
i um s pe e d r e gul at i on - Tur nout s - Pas s i ng bay s -
Pe nal t i e s . - ( a ) No pe r s on s ha l l dr i ve a mot or ve hi c l e a t s uc h a s l ow s pe e d a s t o i mpe de t he nor ma l a nd r e a s ona bl e move me nt of t r a f f i c , e xc e pt whe n r e duc e d s pe e d i s ne c e s s a r y f or s a f e ope r a t i on or i n c ompl i a nc e wi t h t he l a w. . . .
T. C. A. § 55- 8- 154( a ) .
Thi s s t a t ut e i s c i t e d i n onl y t wo Te nne s s e e c a s e s , n e i t h e r of whi c h ma de a ny e xpl i c i t de t e r mi na t i on of wha t
c o n s t i t ut e s a v i ol a t i on of t he s t a t ut e . 1. W t s v . W l k e r s on at i
u p h e l d a j ur y ve r di c t f i ndi ng t he s l ow dr i ve r 40% a t f a ul t f o r a n a c c i de nt . Thi s f i ndi ng of l i a bi l i t y i s c ons i s t e nt wi t h c a s e s i nvol vi ng s i mi l a r s t a t ut e s i n ot he r s t a t e s , whi c h ha v e h e l d a que s t i on of whe t he r s uc h a s t a t ut e ha s be e n vi ol a t e d a n d whe t he r s uc h vi ol a t i on c ons t i t ut e s t he ne gl i ge nt pr oxi ma t e c a u s i n g or c ont r i but i ng t o a n a c c i de nt i s f or t he j ur y. 66 A. L. R. 2d 1194; e . g . , Gr i f f i n v . I l l i noi s Be l l Te l e phone Co . , 1 8 0 N. E. 2d 228, 230 ( I l l . Ct . App. 1962) ; Fonv i l l e v . Di x on,
1 9 3 S. E. 2d 406 ( N. C. Ct . App. 1972) ; Le o v . Adams , 208 N. W 2 d .
7 0 6 ( S. D. 1973) ; M na v . Boi s e Cas c ade Cor p. , 681 P. 2d 880 ,
i
8 8 4 ( W s h. Ct . App. 1984) .
a The s e c a s e s a c knowl e dge t ha t
?d a wd l e r s , a s we l l a s s pe e de r s , c a n be c ome a me na c e t o t he
s a f e t y o f t he i r f e l l ow mot or i s t s . ? Che e k v . W i s s , 615 S. W 2 d e .
1 S e e Ca r r v . Oz b u r n - He s s e y S t o r a g e Co . , 1 9 9 6 W 3 8 3 2 9 5 ( Te n n . Ap p .
L
1996) . I n Ca r r , p l a i n t i f f r e a r - e n d e d d e f e n d a n t , wh o h a d j u s t t u r n e d o n t o t h e h i g h wa y f r o m a n i n t e r s e c t i o n . Th e r e a s o n a b l e n e s s o f t h e d e f e n d a n t ’ s s p e e d , wh i c h wa s n o t d i s p u t e d - 2 0 mp h - wa s n o t d i r e c t l y a d d r e s s e d b y t h e Co u r t . Al t h o u g h t h e Co u r t ma y h a v e ma d e a n i mp l i c i t j u d g me n t t h a t t h e d e f e n d a n t wa s n o t d r i v i n g i n v i o l a t i o n o f t h e s t a t u t e , t h e b a s i s u p o n wh i c h t h e s u mma r y j u d g me n t wa s u p h e l d wa s t h a t a n e x a mi n a t i o n o f t h e c i r c u ms t a n c e s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e a c c i d e n t s u p p o r t e d f i n d i n g p l a i n t i f f mo r e t h a n 5 0 % a t f a u l t i n t h e a c c i d e n t .
Th e o t h e r c a s e i s Wa t t s v . Wi l k e r s o n , 1 9 9 4 W 8 5 9 5 1 ( Te n n . Ap p .
L 1994) .
4 5 3 , 458 ( M Ct . App. 198 1) , quot i ng Laf f e r t y v . W t l e , 349 o. at
S. W 2 d 519, 528 ( M Ct . App. 1961) .
. o.
The s pe e d of t he de f e nda nt ’ s ve hi c l e i s a n i s s ue o f d i s p u t e d ma t e r i a l f a c t , a s i t be a r s on whe t he r t he s t a t ut e wa s v i o l a t e d a nd whe t he r s uc h vi ol a t i on, i f a ny, c ont r i but e d t o t h e pr oxi ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i de nt . Pr oxi ma t e c a us a t i on i s t o b e de t e r mi ne d by t he t r i e r of f a c t , unl e s s a l l r e a s ona bl e
p e r s o n s woul d a gr e e on t he pr ope r out c ome . Se e M Cl e nahan v .
c
Co o l e y , 806 S. W 2d 767 ( Te nn. 1991) .
. Ac c or di ngl y, we va c a t e
s u mma r y j udgme nt on be ha l f of t he s e de f e nda nt s a nd r e ma nd f o r f u r t h e r pr oc e e di ngs c ons i s t e nt wi t h t hi s opi ni on.
Pl a i nt i f f a l s o f i l e d t hi s a c t i on a ga i ns t hi s i ns u r e r u n d e r t he uni ns ur e d a nd unde r i ns ur e d mot or ve hi c l e c ove r a ge
s t a t ut e . W n t he owne r or ope r a t or of a ve hi c l e whi c h c a u s e s he
b o d i l y i nj ur y or pr ope r t y da ma ge i s unknown, t he i ns ur e d c a n o n l y r e c ove r i f :
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk (Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.