ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ
This text of ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ (ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 20, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-0506 Lower Tribunal No. 10-44727 ________________
Anthony W. Battillo, D.C., et al., Appellants,
vs.
Anibal Gomez, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Paul Buschmann (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.
Philip D. Parrish, P.A., and Philip D. Parrish, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828,
834 (Fla. 1990) (providing factors to be considered when determining a
reasonable attorney’s fee).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-w-battillo-dc-v-anibal-gomez-fladistctapp-2021.