ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 2021·No. 20-0506·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 20, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0506 Lower Tribunal No. 10-44727 ________________

Anthony W. Battillo, D.C., et al., Appellants,

vs.

Anibal Gomez, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Paul Buschmann (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.

Philip D. Parrish, P.A., and Philip D. Parrish, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828,

834 (Fla. 1990) (providing factors to be considered when determining a

reasonable attorney’s fee).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ (ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom
555 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)