ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 2021
Docket20-0506
StatusPublished

This text of ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ (ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 20, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0506 Lower Tribunal No. 10-44727 ________________

Anthony W. Battillo, D.C., et al., Appellants,

vs.

Anibal Gomez, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Paul Buschmann (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.

Philip D. Parrish, P.A., and Philip D. Parrish, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828,

834 (Fla. 1990) (providing factors to be considered when determining a

reasonable attorney’s fee).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom
555 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ANTHONY W. BATTILLO, D.C. v. ANIBAL GOMEZ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-w-battillo-dc-v-anibal-gomez-fladistctapp-2021.