Anthony Valdes v. The State of Florida
This text of Anthony Valdes v. The State of Florida (Anthony Valdes v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 24, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1028 Lower Tribunal No. 16-182-A-K ________________
Anthony Valdes, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.
Donald C. Barrett, P.A., and Donald C. Barrett, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–88 (1984)
(setting forth two-part test for ineffective assistance claim); Occhicone v.
State, 768 So. 2d 1037, 1048 (Fla. 2000) (explaining that strategic decisions
of counsel rarely rise to the level of ineffective assistance); see also Miller v.
State, 161 So. 3d 354, 364 (Fla. 2015) (“Ineffective assistance claims are
reviewed under a mixed standard of review because the performance and
prejudice prongs of Strickland present mixed questions of law and fact.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Valdes v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-valdes-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.