Anthony v. Wingfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anthony v. Wingfield

85 S.E. 284, 16 Ga. App. 310, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 602

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1915·No. 5927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

Where the grounds of a motion for a new trial are dependent upon a consideration of the evidence, and a brief of the evidence has not been prepared in even substantial compliance with section 6093 of the Civil Code, this court will not attempt to review the discretion of the trial judge in overruling such grounds. Grier v. Brown, 118 Ga. 670 (45 S. E. 455); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Gairdner v. Tate, 121 Ga. 253 (48 S. E. 907); Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (75 S. E. 254); Albany &c. R. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

Where the grounds of a motion for a new trial are dependent upon a consideration of the evidence, and a brief of the evidence has not been prepared in even substantial compliance with section 6093 of the Civil Code, this court will not attempt to review the discretion of the trial judge in overruling such grounds. Grier v. Brown, 118 Ga. 670 (45 S. E. 455); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Gairdner v. Tate, 121 Ga. 253 (48 S. E. 907); Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (75 S. E. 254); Albany &c. R. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114). Judgment affirmed.

Anthony v. Wingfield, 85 S.E. 284, 16 Ga. App. 310, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 602 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

85 S.E. 284 (Anthony v. Wingfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related