Home/Supreme Court/Anthony v. Veatch

Anthony v. Veatch

340 U.S. 923, 71 S. Ct. 499
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 26, 1951
DocketNo. 494
StatusPublished

This text of 340 U.S. 923 (Anthony v. Veatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony v. Veatch, 340 U.S. 923, 71 S. Ct. 499 (1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed [924]*924for the want of a substantial federal question.

George W. Mead for appellants. George Neuner, Attorney General of Oregon, and Cecil H. Quesseth and Carlisle B. Roberts, Assistant Attorneys General, for Veatch et al.; and Ben Anderson for the Columbia River Fishermen’s Protective Union et al., appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 U.S. 923, 71 S. Ct. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-v-veatch-scotus-1951.