Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Anthony v. State

Anthony v. State

65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 462
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1909
Docket2058
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 816 (Anthony v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony v. State, 65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 462 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no-error in refusing a new trial.

2. Tt is not error to instruct the jury that after having arrived at the truth of the case so far as the facts are concerned, they shall apply to these facts the law as given in charge by the court.

3. In the absence of a timely written request asking explicit instructions, the fact that a proposition which might properly have been stated to the jury more lucidly and more fully is not thus presented affords no ground for new trial, where the general principles of law involved in the case are fairly presented. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
145 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Cronin v. State
141 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Bowen
119 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt
110 S.E. 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Weldon v. State
94 S.E. 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-v-state-gactapp-1909.