Anthony v. State

65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 462
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1909·No. 2058·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no-error in refusing a new trial.

2. Tt is not error to instruct the jury that after having arrived at the truth of the case so far as the facts are concerned, they shall apply to these facts the law as given in charge by the court.

3. In the absence of a timely written request asking explicit instructions, the fact that a proposition which might properly have been stated to the jury more lucidly and more fully is not thus presented affords no ground for new trial, where the general principles of law involved in the case are fairly presented. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony v. State, 65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 462 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 816 (Anthony v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
145 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Cronin v. State
141 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Bowen
119 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt
110 S.E. 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Weldon v. State
94 S.E. 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)