Anthony v. Kuhne

Fourth Circuit

Anthony v. Kuhne

533 F. App'x 192

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2013·No. No. 13-6012·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Lee Anthony appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anthony v. Khune, No. 1:12-cv-00387-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Lee Anthony appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anthony v. Khune, No. 1:12-cv-00387-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Anthony v. Kuhne, 533 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

533 F. App'x 192 (Anthony v. Kuhne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related