Anthony v. Dunlap

8 Cal. 26, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 277
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 8 Cal. 26 (Anthony v. Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony v. Dunlap, 8 Cal. 26, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 277 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

This was a bill in equity filed in the Fifth District Court, to enjoin the execution of a judgment obtained in the Sixth District.

We have before decided, that one Court had no power to interfere with the judgments and decrees of another Court of concurrent jurisdiction. The only case in which it will bo allowed, is where the Court in which the action or proceeding is pending, is unable by reason of its jurisdiction to afford the relief sought. Any other rule would lead to inextricable confusion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

REGENTS OF UNIV. OF CALIF. v. Superior Court
225 Cal. App. 3d 972 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
Heine Piano Co. v. Bloomer
191 P. 900 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
Lowry v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.
126 N.E. 223 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)
Lutey Bros. v. Jackson
179 P. 459 (Montana Supreme Court, 1919)
Hawkeye Insurance v. Huston
89 N.W. 29 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Beck v. Fransham
53 P. 96 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)
Spreckels v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.
49 P. 353 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Lake Bistenbau Lumber Co. v. Mimms
22 So. 730 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1897)
Scott v. Runner
44 N.E. 755 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)
Guardianship of Murphy
1 Coffey 107 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1885)
Platto v. Deuster
22 Wis. 482 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cal. 26, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-v-dunlap-cal-1857.