Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
INFO TRH TEH UEN SITOEUDT HSTEARTNE DSI DSTISRTICRTIC OTF C OOHUIROT WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BRIAN ANTHONY,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-469
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL District Judge Michael J. Newman SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”) (DOC. NO. 14); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $1,350.00 IN EAJA FEES
This Social Security case is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $1,350.00 and no costs, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under EAJA in this case. (Doc. No. 14). The parties indicate that before filing their present motion, they jointly reached a resolution to settle the EAJA fees in this case. Id. Therefore, the Court: (1) GRANTS parties’ joint motion (Doc. No. 14); and (2) AWARDS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $1,350.00 and no costs. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel. No further matters require review in this case; accordingly, it remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 13, 2021 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security (Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.