Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Anthony v. Cody

Anthony v. Cody

69 S.E. 491, 135 Ga. 329, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 520
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 491 (Anthony v. Cody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony v. Cody, 69 S.E. 491, 135 Ga. 329, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 520 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

The maker of a promissory note, which recites that its consideration is the purchase-price of described personal property, but docs not purport to integrate the sale contract, may, in defense to a suit on the note by the seller, plead as failure of consideration a breach of a contemporaneous oral warranty. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music House, 134 Ga. 288 (67 S. E. 654).

(cr) It was error to strike the plea on general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S. & S. Builders, Inc. v. Equitable Investment Corp.
134 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Hawkins v. Haynes
150 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Smith v. Fisher
102 S.E. 170 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Bond & Maxwell v. Perrin
88 S.E. 954 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Whitchard v. Exchange National Bank
82 S.E. 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Toller v. Hewitt
77 S.E. 650 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Broach
73 S.E. 1063 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 491, 135 Ga. 329, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-v-cody-ga-1910.