Anthony v. Cody
69 S.E. 491, 135 Ga. 329, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 520
Opinion
The maker of a promissory note, which recites that its consideration is the purchase-price of described personal property, but docs not purport to integrate the sale contract, may, in defense to a suit on the note by the seller, plead as failure of consideration a breach of a contemporaneous oral warranty. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music House, 134 Ga. 288 (67 S. E. 654).
(cr) It was error to strike the plea on general demurrer.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony v. Cody, 69 S.E. 491, 135 Ga. 329, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 520 (Ga. 1910).
69 S.E. 491 (Anthony v. Cody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
S. & S. Builders, Inc. v. Equitable Investment Corp.
134 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Hawkins v. Haynes
150 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Smith v. Fisher
102 S.E. 170 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Bond & Maxwell v. Perrin
88 S.E. 954 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Whitchard v. Exchange National Bank
82 S.E. 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Toller v. Hewitt
77 S.E. 650 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Broach
73 S.E. 1063 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)